Full physical source page · unreviewed extraction

The Indian Contract Act, 1872: page 15

The Indian Contract Act, 1872, India Code delivered snapshot 85a7a066098255c9, physical page 15. Unreviewed extraction.

Source: official India Code PDF · catalog record. Fetched 2026-10-19T23:06:49Z. SHA-256 85a7a066098255c93001d678aeaf483f91d3080918363c03b78d40c3eeb8b386.

Legal currency, territorial applicability and extraction fidelity are unverified. Catalog checksum/size differs from the delivered PDF; both identities are retained. Sections, state notes and footnotes share these physical pages. Compare the full original image.

Retained layout text

                                                          Illustrations

     (a) A sells, by auction, to B, a horse which A knows to be unsound. A says nothing to B about the horse’s unsoundness.
This is not fraud in A.
     (b) B is A’s daughter and has just come of age. Here, the relation between the parties would make it A’s duty to tell B if the
horse is unsound.
     (c) B says to A—“If you do not deny it, I shall assume that the horse is sound.” A says nothing. Here, A’s silence is
equivalent to speech.
     (d) A and B, being traders, enter upon a contract. A has private information of a change in prices which would affect B’s
willingness to proceed with the contract. A is not bound to inform B.
     18. “Misrepresentation” defined.—“Misrepresentation” means and includes—
          (1) the positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it,
     of that which is not true, though he believes it to be true;
         (2) any breach of duty which, without an intent to deceive, gains an advantage to the person
     committing it, or any one claiming under him; by misleading another to his prejudice, or to the
     prejudice of any one claiming under him;
          (3) causing, however innocently, a party to an agreement, to make a mistake as to the substance
     of the thing which is the subject of the agreement.
                                                                                      e
                                                                              od
    19. Voidability of agreements without free consent.—When consent to an agreement is caused by
                                                                       aC
coercion,1*** fraud or misrepresentation, the agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party
whose consent was so caused.
                                                                 di
    A party to a contract whose consent was caused by fraud or misrepresentation, may, if he thinks fit,
insist that the contract shall be performed, and that he shall be put in the position in which he would have
been if the representations made had been true.             In
    Exception.—If such consent was caused by misrepresentation or by silence, fraudulent within the
meaning of section 17, the contract, nevertheless, is not voidable, if the party whose consent was so
caused had the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence.
    Explanation.—A fraud or misrepresentation which did not cause the consent to a contract of the party
on whom such fraud was practised, or to whom such misrepresentation was made, does not render a
contract voidable.
                                                          Illustrations
     (a) A, intending to deceive B, falsely represents that five hundred maunds of indigo are made annually at A’s factory, and
thereby induces B to buy the factory. The contract is voidable at the option of B.
     (b) A, by a misrepresentation, leads B erroneously to believe that, five hundred maunds of indigo are made annually at A’s
factory. B examines the accounts of the factory, which show that only four hundred maunds of indigo have been made. After this
B buys the factory. The contract is not voidable on account of A’s misrepresentation.
    (c) A fraudulently informs B that A’s estate is free from in cumbrance. B thereupon buys the estate. The estate is subject to a
mortgage. B may either avoid the contract, or may insist on its being carried out and the mortgage debt redeemed.
    (d) B, having discovered a vein of ore on the estate of A, adopts means to conceal, and does conceal, the existence of the ore
from A. Through A’s ignorance B is enabled to buy the estate at an under-value. The contract is voidable at the option of A.
      (e) A is entitled to succeed to an estate at the death of B; B dies: C, having received intelligence of B’s death, prevents the
intelligence reaching A, and thus induces A to sell him his interest in the estate. The sale is voidable at the option of A.
    [19A. Power to set aside contract induced by undue influence.—When consent to an agreement is
     2

caused by undue influence, the agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party whose consent
was so caused.


1. The words “undue influence” rep. by Act 6 of 1899, s. 3.
2. Ins. by Act 6 of 1899, s. 3.

                                                                15

Compare original page image