Full physical source page · unreviewed extraction

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: page 247

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, India Code delivered snapshot 393b8848fdfc476a, physical page 247, typed edition 77428589d4e341672ed6a3e5f663be7dec530c42d0600064ac1314302939267d. Unreviewed extraction.

Source: official India Code PDF · catalog record. Fetched 2026-10-19T23:06:46Z. SHA-256 393b8848fdfc476a21cc3abf4f0d3f510557e2dff6fc6914b1f379bea1730614.

Legal currency, territorial applicability and extraction fidelity are unverified. Catalog checksum/size differs from the delivered PDF; both identities are retained. Sections, state notes and footnotes share these physical pages. Compare the full original image.

Retained layout text

     4. That the said piece of ground contained in fact only [five bighas].
     5. [Facts showing when the cause of action arose and that the Court has jurisdiction.]
     6. The value of the subject-matter of the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction is.............rupees and for the purpose
of court-fees is...................rupees.
     7. The plaintiff claims—
            (1) ............... rupees, with interest from the ................ day of.................20.......... .
            (2) that the said agreement be delivered up and cancelled.
                                                          No. 35
                                          AN INJUNCTION RESTRAINING WASTE
                                                       (Title)
A. B., the above-named plaintiff states as follows:—
          1. The plaintiff is the absolute owner of [describe the property].
          2. The defendant is in possession of the same under a lease from the plaintiff.
          3. The defendant has [cut down a number of valuable trees, and threatens to cut down many more for the
    purpose of sale] without the consent of the plaintiff.
          4. [Facts showing when the cause of action arose and that the Court has jurisdiction.]
          5. The value of the subject-matter of the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction is.......... rupees and for the
    purpose of court-fees is........... rupees.
          6. The plaintiff claims that the defendant be restrained by injunction from committing or permitting any further
    waste on the said premises.                                               e
        [Pecuniary compensation may also be claimed.]                    od
                                                           No. 36
                                                                aC
                                           INJUNCTION RESTRAINING NUISANCE
                                                       (Title)
A. B., the above-named plaintiff, states as follows:—
                                                           di
                                                      In
        1. Plaintiff is, and at all the times hereinafter mentioned was, the absolute owner of [the house
    No.....................Street, Calcutta].
        2. The defendant is, and at all the said times was, the absolute owner of [a plot of ground in the same
    street................].
        3. On the.................. day of...............20.........., the defendant erected upon his said plot a
    slaughter-house, and still maintains the same; and from that day until the present time has continually caused
    cattle to be brought and killed there [and has caused the blood and offal to be thrown into the street opposite the
    said house of the plaintiff].
        [4. In consequence the plaintiff has been compelled to abandon the said house, and has been unable to rent
the same.]
        5. [Facts showing when the cause of action arose and that the Court has jurisdiction.]
        6. The value of the subject-matter of the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction is……………. rupees and for the
purpose of court-fees is...........rupees.
        7. The plaintiff claims that the defendant be restrained by injunction from committing or permitting any
further nuisance.
                                                          No. 37
                                                    PUBLIC NUISANCE
                                                        (Title)
A. B., the above-named plaintiff, states as follows:—
           1. The defendant has wrongly heaped up earth and stones on a public road known as...............Street
    at...........so as to obstruct the passage of the public along the same and threatens and intends, unless restrained
    from so doing, to continue and repeat the said wrongful act.
        1
          [*2. The plaintiff has obtained the leave of the Court for the institution of this suit.] As in paras. 4 and 5 of
       Form No. 1]



1. Subs. by Act 104 of 1976, s. 93, for paragraph 2 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
*Not applicable where suit is instituted by the Advocate-General.


                                                            247

Compare original page image