Full physical source page · unreviewed extraction
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: page 244
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, India Code delivered snapshot 393b8848fdfc476a, physical page 244, typed edition 77428589d4e341672ed6a3e5f663be7dec530c42d0600064ac1314302939267d. Unreviewed extraction.
Source: official India Code PDF · catalog record. Fetched 2026-10-19T23:06:46Z. SHA-256 393b8848fdfc476a21cc3abf4f0d3f510557e2dff6fc6914b1f379bea1730614.
Legal currency, territorial applicability and extraction fidelity are unverified. Catalog checksum/size differs from the delivered PDF; both identities are retained. Sections, state notes and footnotes share these physical pages. Compare the full original image.
Retained layout text
No. 26
OBSTRUCTING A HIGHWAY
(Title)
1. The defendant wrongfully dug a trench and heaped up earth and stones in the public highway
leading from.................. to......... so as to obstruct it.
2. Thereby the plaintiff, while lawfully passing along the said highway, fell over the said earth and
stones, [or into the said trench] and broke his arm, and suffered great pain, and was prevented from
attending to his business for a long time, and incurred expense for medical attendance.
[As in paras. 4 and 5 of Form No. 1, and relief claimed.]
No. 27
DIVERTING A WATER-COURSE
(Title)
A. B., the above-named plaintiff, states as follows:—
1. The plaintiff is, and at the time hereinafter mentioned was, possessed of a mill situated on a
[stream] known as the......... , in the village of........... , district of..........
2. By reason of such possession the plaintiff was entitled to the flow of the stream for working
the mill.
e
3. On the....................... day of................20......, the defendant, by cutting the bank of the stream,
od
wrongfully diverted the water thereof, so that less water ran into the plaintiff’s mill.
4. By reason thereof the plaintiff has been unable to grind more than....... sacks per day, whereas,
aC
before the said diversion of water, he was able to grind......sacks per day.
[As in paras. 4 and 5 of Form No. 1, and relief claimed.]
di No. 28
In
OBSTRUCTING A RIGHT TO USE WATER FOR IRRIGATION
(Title)
A. B., the above-named plaintiff, states as follows:—
1. The plaintiff is, and was at the times hereinafter mentioned was, possessed of certain lands
situate, etc., and entitled to take and use a portion of the water of a certain stream for irrigating the
said lands.
2. On the.................day of.......................20.........., the defendant prevented the plaintiff from
taking and using the said portion of the said water as aforesaid, by wrongfully obstructing and
diverting the said stream.
[As in paras. 4 and 5 of Form No. 1, and relief claimed.]
No. 29
INJURIES CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE ON A RAILROAD
(Title)
A. B., the above-named plaintiff, states as follows:—
1. On the............ day of.............20........., the defendants were common carriers of passengers by
railway between ....... ...... and ...................
2. On that day the plaintiff was a passenger in one of the carriages of the defendants on the said
railway.
3. While he was such passenger, at............... [or near the station of................. or between the
stations of ................... and .................. ], a collision occurred on the said railway caused by the negligence and
unskill, fulness of the defendants’ servants, whereby the plaintiff was much injured [having his leg broken, his
head cut, etc., and state the special damage, if any, as], and incurred expense for medical attendance and is
permanently disabled from carrying on his former business as [a salesman].
[As in paras. 4 and 5 of Form No. 1, and relief claimed.]
244
Compare original page image
